Nice try Shambles. But if I wanted a go at Max, I would do the job myself.

The question still stands. This time I see:

"No matter how well-intentioned - the idea that unknown numbers of anonymous volunteers are now required to impose their reactive judgement on the invited contributions of fellow posters in order to protect us from offending ourselves - is plainly too silly for serious consideration. But that is what is defended as being necessary."

Who in God's name do you think invites the volunteers to operate here.

Please give a straight answer and name that person.