The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #79726   Message #1449112
Posted By: GUEST,The Shambles
01-Apr-05 - 11:47 AM
Thread Name: BS: Mudcat censorship - a proposal
Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat censorship - a proposal
Are you saying that Max is not able to read the posts on the forum?

Are you saying that individual posters are not responsible for their actions?

Are you saying that as he appointed them that Max is responsible for ALL of the actions and public statements of Joe and Co - so they can do as they wish?

Are you saying that when Joe Offer uses an editorial comment to tell another poster to politly **** ***, (as in this thread) that this then becomes Max's view and Official Mudcat Policy?

I suggesting that in future - any personal opinions and comments are not made by posters in editorial comments - to avoid any confusion (and prevent any possible legal actions against Max). This is not rocket science.

The generally agreed logic in the world - that most of us live in - is that the greater individual responsibility given to people in postions of trust - the better example they are are expected to set in their persoanl behaviour. And when they fail in this - they are prepared to accept the consequences.

Here it would seem that (some of) these people expect to be able to do just as they please - as it is thought - that Max is answerable - not them.