Brilliant!

Now because some anonymous volunteer has closed yet another thread and moved these two posts here - this thread (or Jon's posted re-posted PM with it persoanal references) will have to be deleted. As the originator of this thread is now going to demand (yet more) imposed censorship action from our volunteers. Perhaps our anonymous volunteer could have actually read the original post in this thread first?

Please discuss, without specific references to individuals. Where despite my plea, specific references are made to incidents or people in this thread, I will request from the clones that such postings be deleted. Let's keep this a generic and civilised discussion.

George

Can we just leave matters of personal taste to each poster to decide? No one is being forced to read or respond to any thread. Choosing to open the thread or not - to read the posts or not - to respond or not - is enough judgement already. Can we and our volunteers just mind our own business and concentrate on what we post - rather than judge and be encouraged to pass judgement - on what everyone else posts.

If Jon's post is not to be removed and George's wishes are to be ignored by our volunteers - perhaps The apology posted by the individual now named in Jon's post - can be placed here also?