If we assume for a moment that he has done the things he is accused of in the evidence presented in this trial - is it really possible for someone with this amount of money (or at least earning capacity) - to ever be found guilty?

What are the jury supposed to make of a situation where nearly all of the witnesses are either being sued by Michael Jackson (or liable to be sued) or Michael Jackson is being sued by them?

And regardless of whether he is guilty oe not - given his personal problems - is this really someone who is capable of being the sole parent of his own children?