I think it's possible and even probable that MJ is innocent of everything except being weird.

Other people (less rich) who are equally weird - tend not to have their weirdness used (and accepted) as excuse - when their weirdness places their children and others at risk.

Following incidents such as the 'balcony scene' - the ability of other weird people (as parents) to protect children from this weirdness would be rightly brought into question by the authorities set-up to protect children. It does not appear to have been the case with MJ.

Whether we consider Michael Jackson to be weird or not - is not really the issue - it is whether the law of the land applies equally to the effects that one's weirdness has on others (especially children).