I have to admit it -- when I first heard this I really wanted to find out what the spin would be. For just the reasons Doug has just laid out -- that it opens up for teh confiscation of privately owned homes to the Walmarts -- and there are few things on this earth more reviled by liberals than the Walmarts -- and yet it was the liberal's guys who voted the huge break for the Walmarts. The conservatives on the bench acted as I would have expected them to act.

Does it come down to the conservatives on the bench believing in private property and the liberals not? How else could it be interpreted?