On the More Galloway thread I expressed the opinion that Blair's policy in Iraq was responsible for bringing the suicide bombers onto the streets of London and making the UK a target for terrorism.

Shakey responded with the remark that "We should be proud to be the No1 terget for the fundamentalist terrorists".
I wonder if the families of the dead in London feel the same pride as Shakey.

To me there is little difference between the sentiments expressed by
Shakey and those held by the suicide bombers.

Shakey stated that he saw Carol, Diana and "others" on this forum as "dangerous", in reality it is people like Shakey who are dangerous with their dogmatic fight to the death mentality.

The best post on this thread in my opinion came from McGrath, who said
"Trying to understand why something is happening, is not the same as condoning or accepting it"

Carol and Diana, whether you agree with them or not always attempt to rationalise their subject.

Shakey on the other hand appears an ignorant bully with little of value to say about terrorism and its causes, and what he does say seems destructive and dangerous.

In many ways he reminds me of the late un-lamented Teribus....Ake