If you did your research, Roger, you'd find that MANY of the clones, including me, have been upfront about who we are from the get-go. But, of course, that wouldn't support your argument, would it, so why bother. Only if it serves your convoluted minutiae.

Rather than having to research such things - perhaps then it would lift things a little if the names of those who are upfront were known to their fellow posters?

Those who have no problem with being known - will have no reason not to send a PM to ask the originator's permission before any proposed change to a thread title.

Those who choose to remain anonymous - will NOT be able to do this and remain anonymous. They will have to rely on those (like yourself)who are prepared to be known - to speak for them.

Perhaps in future - those who are still NOT prepared to be known and to stand by their actions - should NOT be able to impose their judgement upon the rest of their fellow posters who are prepared to be known and to stand by their actions?