While still on the side of dropping the bombs 60 years ago, I see a disadvantage in reporting the experiences of individuals back then.

The enormity of the bombs should not be forgotten. As I said before, pray that the 3rd one is never used by anyone. However, Some of us reading and/or participating here have experienced first hand the effects of weapons that could duplicate, for the individual, what they went through back then. A thousand bomb exhibits the same concussive factor when you are "within range" The same can be said for a 500 pound bomb, such as those being used in Iraq. The use of Napalm in 'Nam also caused many to look as if they were within a mile or two of ground zero. The effects and lasting results are no different for todays victims than they were 60 years ago.

I don't mistake the effects back then. On an anecdotal basis, however, it takes away the severity of the Atom, Hydrogen and Plutonium bombs. It is a terrible method of waging war but one that was thought necessary at one time. Todays available weapons make those look mild. If you want to keep people aware of the enormous potential of WMD, keep them reminded of the big picture.