Paul, would it not be okay to offer a fair (I know, you think yours is fair) and an intelligent reply (yours wasn't) to Robomatic be easy to do?
He certainly had enough documented thoughts to be addressed in a dialogue that could be continued to allow new information and opinions to be generated here for the enlightenment of all.

Rather, you read, saw items you either don't agree with with or don't understand and combined with your apparent inability to neither research or to possibly alter preconceieved notions, you elect to say, his opinions are totally incorrect.

Summation: If I were a new person to this place this AM and went to this thread first, I would have two conclusions; The first is half the posters here go to great lengths to substantiate their opinions. The other half are closed minded individuals who automatically denigrate a person whose ideas and thoughts are out of phase with theirs. Robo did substantition, you did not. We don't have to believe any of what he said but simply say he is wrong without offering any evidence to him is probably indicative of one of the things that are affecting this Country.

If I had just dropped in on the planet Earth, saw this thread, I would certainly be swayed to say that the openminded one (Robo)knows the truth as he had done some homework and was offering debateable proof.
A person is not always wrong just because his beliefs are different than another.