Check this out and decide (whatever your beliefs) whether you want ID taught in *science classes* as an important *scientific* challenge to Daewin :

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact

"Intelligent design" (the basis for just about every religion) has been a topic in *comparative religion* classes since forever. It's this insistence that it's really science that's new and disturbing.