"fellow posters" is totally incorrect and irrelavant when they are acting as proxies for Max. As it the term volunteer as they were all recruited by Max.

There may be some truth in some of this but the practical difficulty here - that you do not address - is when our anonymous fellow posters insist on their right to also express their persoanal view as well as claiming to be acting as Max's proxy.

How are their fellow posters to know when one of these anonymous fellow posters are speaking for Max - and with his authority - and when they are expressing their own view. A personal view that may well be totally different to Max's and being made in posts which can be retrieved at any time.

And like the following examples - these personal views are anonymously inserted into the existing posts of their fellow posters - without these poster's knowledge or permission.


The issue is not up for debate. Basaed on his repetitious postings The Shambles cannot seem to understand this. joe-clone
From Opening threads

Or from Max what about Shambles requests

Yes, Rog-o, as you can see it was redundant and covered by this thread. And no one was talking turds over there, so I exercised editorial control so that we can talk about turds. Stay on subject please. Mudelf

I am closing this. It is redundant and deals with the same issue as two other threads. It will just become another 1000 post thread with nothing new to add. Please use the existing threads.
Thanks, Mudelf

I see you have arrived first. Blessings upon you Mudelf....I have your back!.......FatClone


All posters are entitled to post their views but until there is another clear way of informing our forum exactly which hat is being worn - perhaps all personal views can be contained only in coventional posts using the volunteer poster's usual name - and not made anonymously?