"The experts on what is wrong like Boobert, do not have anything to say when you ask them what should be done. All they know is what they don't like. They have no ideas to offer, just negative comments on everything".


I think, Old Guy, that you must be blind, if you haven't noticed that Bobert & Co HAVE said repeatedly what should be done.....Impeach the bastard!

Guest A, and all the others who keep asking which law GW has broken, I think I may be able to help. Even if one accepts that SECTION IV refers only to search and seizure, I would contend (and I'm sure precedent exists) that wiretap IS arguably a form of S & S, where the seizure is information.

However, there is another side to this. If GW has broken his oath to defend the constitution, he is also guilty of the crime of perjury, an offence punishable upon conviction with fine, or imprisonment. Do you allow criminals to serve as President?

Don T.