Aside from posting misleading snips taken out of context, Crowbar seems to think it's ok for Bush to break the law because others have done so. Not only did the others not break the law, it isn't acceptable to do it because others did it.

I suppose if Clinton rounded up 200,000 citizens and gassed them to death in a secret concentration camp, it's perfectly acceptable for Bush to do the same.

But it's the anti-Bush contingent who are a bunch of ignorant kooks who think they are Constitution scholars.