pdq, I never intended to imply the LA Times was intelligent, just biased.

And one more time, it is not about doing what you might consider the 'proper thing', it is about reporting style. I could less who returns the money and who doesn't. That part of it is basically business as usual.

By the way, Rapaire, I heard it was $12,000 for Ms. Rodham Clinton. But, I wasn't looking for defensive posturing on the part of Dem supporters, (or Repubs), simply illustrating report style.