Can you offer any evidence that the documents that Dan Rather presented were forged???

Has changed to:

"facts which those documents represented, however, were not bogus"

Knox explains that the August 18, 1973 date typed on one of the "forged" documents proves that they were faked. Group Commander Staudt, who allegedly had been putting pressure on Killian, retired in 1972.

There are terms in these memos that are not Guard terms but that are Army terms. They use the word 'Billets'. I think they were using that to refer to the slot. That would be a non-flying slot the way we would use it. And the style... they are sloppy looking."

If the facts are true, why would the documents be forged? Just pull out the real ones and the whole thing will be layed to rest. If we do not have the original ones to go by how do we know the facts are correct?

Why were they artificially aged? Why were authentic looking signatures forged on these documents?

The original assertion that the documents were not forged has been proven wrong so now the argument has been changed to "The facts are true"

The flimsiest shard of anything that a Liberal wants to belive is true is called a "fact"

Anything a Liberal does not want to believe is called a "lie"