Troll refers to Kerry when he writes, "I would not have wanted to serve under a commander who took those kinds of risks with MY life."

How would you like to serve under a commander that tortures POWS and doesn't give a damn what may happen to you under the same circumstances? In fact, the U.S. basically says its O.K. to torture. As a soldier who may at any time be captured by enemy forces, does that make you feel safe and secure?

Don't you think that puts all U.S. soldiers in a high-risk category? If they don't kill you, you can always look forward to capture and torture. Doesn't sound very risk-free to me.

At this point, Kerry has very little to do with actions of Bush. Bush has to stand on his own two feet and so do you.