from that blog:
"All in all, I find it hard to comprehend that anyone could possibly see the above as some sort of "win" scenario. And yet, we are told this may be necessary to prevent the Iranians from getting a nuclear weapon maybe in ten years (and maybe more years before it could be delivered). "


Of course, the fact that the Iranians have already obtained the delivery system, and are more like 2 to 3 years from functional, deliverable nuclear weapons ( at the outside) seems to have been missed.

In addition, assume that Iran hits, say 5 Israeli cities. Then look at the fallout patterns, and ask yourself if there could even be a Palestinian state in that region afterwards- even on the West Bank.