ok.. as I've been asked by another member to account for the intention
of what I 'impishly' posted here..

how about as a gesture of considered reason, good humour and goodwill,
you reinstate the first of the posts I wrote this afternoon ?

you know the one that demonstrates I at least spent a little time
carefully thinking it out and drafting
with some delicacy and diplomacy..!?

[sure would be helpful if I had a saved copy to refer to..]

Afterall, the reason I split the post over 2 entries
was to allow for the possibility of the 2nd part being deleted
[for probably the same reason [?]as yesterday's]..

[but how are any of us to ever know,
when censors leave no evidence
of their judgement and interaction in public affairs ?]


so surely, thats not too much to ask considering the context of this thread subject,
and its associated issues..??????????

..but on the other hand, no point making mountains out of molehills
and provoking unintended escalation of otherwise unimportant concerns..

even though that does seem the norm for mudcat 'debates'