The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #73264   Message #1705542
Posted By: beardedbruce
29-Mar-06 - 08:28 AM
Thread Name: BS: NON-Partisan political comments
Subject: RE: BS: NON-Partisan political comments
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2002/SC7564.doc.htm

http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/15016.htm

http://www.iraqwatch.org/un/unscresolutions/PVRs-debates/un-scdebate-021903.htm

"December 19: the Security Council hears an initial, closed-doors assessment of the Iraqi dossier from Drs. Blix and ElBaradei. Both officials tell reporters that the declaration appears deficient in important respects. Blix states: "There were a lot of open questions at the end of 1998...and these have not been answered by evidence in the new declaration. ... An opportunity was missed in the declaration to give a lot of evidence..." For example: "Iraq declared earlier that they had produced about 8,500 litres of anthrax, and there was not sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it was limited to 8,500, so we must ask ourselves, was there more?""

http://www.acronym.org.uk/textonly/dd/dd69/69nr01.htm

http://www.iraqwatch.org/un/unscresolutions/PVRs-debates/un-scmeeting-031203.htm

http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/AllDocsByUNID/97e9b9191b64dab449256ce800055700


"11. [The Security Council] directs the executive chairman of Unmovic and the director-general of the IAEA to report immediately to the council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding inspections under this resolution. "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2412837.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2759653.stm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/836223/posts


YOU state that Saddam was doing what the UN wanted, and give NO reference other than your own imagination.


Care to read about what you have made so many declarations without support?