I have every right, as a moderator of this forum, to judge the worth of the posts. That is exactly what moderators do, in addition to the housekeeping.

Perhaps you currently do have some right but do not all rights come with some responsiblity? Or perhaps what you have also is but a privilige and one that can be taken away should this this privilige be seen to be abused?

For when you are posting only to judge the worth of your fellow posters and threatening them - how would the rest of our forum know when you are setting this example in your role of moderator - and when you are doing exactly the same thing as a poster?

So go ahead and see if you can slip another false premise by. But in the meantime, any attacks, or redundant threads will be closed or deleted.
Mick

Who deletes the abusive personal attacks against fellow posters that you set the prime example of posting and for which sadly there are only too many examples of?

And what exactly would you judge to be one of these redundant threads that you threaten you will now close or delete?

Do you not think that our forum should continue be shaped be the public's contributions, rather than which and how many of these contributions you and your anonymous companions can delete?

And as your Chief has now publicly admitted that these measures have failed to bring the required peace - do you also wish to join him in excluding the public from posting BS?

Do you need to be censored?