Okay, Bruce... Since you are on a crusade here to engage me into an aragument on how many angels can dance on the end of a pin let's play a little revisionism here... Heck, after reading Teribus's revisionist crap about the Vietnam war on another thread, hey???...

Okay, lets say that Bush hadn't attacked Iraq and the Saudi Proposal had, with a few negotiated twist had produced a treaty and normalization between Isreal and Iran and that both had embassies in each other countries... And lets say that Iran and Isreal had student exchange programs... And lets even say, since we are dealing with hypotheticals here, that the two countries were even involved in a joint energy facility???....

Now to Wit: Today, after 3 years or peace and harmony between two former enemies, Iran decided that Isreal should be destroyed becuase someone reminded Iran that it once harbored those feelings???

Now back to Philosophy 101... Is there congruence in the above stated scenerio??? If so, in less than 500 words, explain...

This is really what it boils down to here, bruce... You are asking me to prove something that is impossible to "prove"... It can't be done anymore than you can come up with a response to the above question... You can give me your opinion but you cannot prove your opinion...

Bobert