I don't see any real points being addressed here. Unless we have a systematic list of what Roger said that was deleted we cannot judge whether it was appropriate for it to be deleted.

In this thread - you do have a record of (at least) some of the abusive personal attacks posted by the chief of the Mudcat Editing team has repeatedly made on me (in public). You can have more evidence of these posts - if you require it.

As a result of this - can our forum ever accept that whatever censorship actions are imposed on my contributions are NOT personally motivated? For that is what the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team are expecting you to accept.....

You do have the material here to judge that question.