I have no personal proof as to the chemical make up of what I call smoke screens, although I have read many different analysis of the phenomenon. Nor have I made any value judgments as to the safety or dangers of such a program.

I do have the paper in which Edward Teller first proposed the spraying program. I have witnessed a perfectly blue sky turn into a hazy blusih white sky in as little as 45 minutes as a direct result from as few as 3 jet trails that spread rapidly over the entire sky.

The most clearcut difference from a con trail that dissipates in about a minute from a spray trail is that the spray begins to lool like it is growing teeth like a comb to one side or another within 30 seconds from its release. Within 10 minutes the trail widens to about a quarter mile. Depending on the altitude and wind the trail appears to cover up to miles within an hour.

As a sky watcher all my life I recall with great detail the first chem trail I saw on a crisp February morning in 1995.
People now in their twenties have no adult memory to know how the sky and con trails should actually look.
Kids who are up to 15 years of age have no frame of reference whatsoever as to the changed nature of the sky and the added chem trails.

That some people 30 years of age and older have not noticed the change is troubling to me. I strikes me as sad that some people are so unobservant as to not even see what has happened to their sky.


_______________________________


As to why there was a 50 day cessation of the smoke screen trails, I can only speculate.


? The trails were catalysing too much percipitation.

? The flooding rain patterns in the Eastern USA provided so much cloud cover that man made clouds were not required.

? The logistics to create the spray campaign broke down.



Allowing a precious few clear blue skies this summer when people are outside much of time was still much appreciated.