The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #93424   Message #1798246
Posted By: katlaughing
31-Jul-06 - 06:53 PM
Thread Name: BS: FU Bill Clinton
Subject: RE: BS: FU Bill Clinton
GOOD Democrats, unafraid to post under their own moniker, QUESTION AUTHORITY and don't take ANYBODY'S word, including nameless cowards, for anything. They also do NOT believe every word they hear, unlike the fundie sheep who support the shrub et al. In CT, Dems are paying attention to what they know has been true in recent years...it is time for Joe (Lieberman) to Go! The NYTs agrees:

On Sunday, the two most influential newspapers in Connecticut issued endorsements in the Democratic primary race between U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman and Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont.

The Hartford Courant offered a tepid endorsement of the incumbent, arguing that since the war is only one issue and Lieberman votes with his party 90 percent of the time, there isn't enough reason to turn him out of office.

What the New York Times said, on the other hand, was momentous. The editors endorsed Ned Lamont, accusing Joe Lieberman not just of shilling for George Bush's war, but of providing Bush cover for his abridgement of civil liberties and expansion of presidential power. Whatever momentum Lieberman might've gained from Bill Clinton's recent drive-by in Waterbury had been slowed with a few sharp words from the paper of record.