The question was not the word 'source'.

Nor was the suggestion that stating where a singer first heard their song was a bad idea.

It was if the use of the speciic term 'source singer' to describe a performer should continue.

As some do have a problem with its use in this manner and its use can be so easily avoided by simply saying what the source was - perhaps it is a term that should now be avoided when describing an indiviual?