Old--


By special request:


Thanks for pointing out that we have unfinished business here.

I was so impressed with your red type--it just beggars description. And a lot more fun than a dictionary for you, I'm sure.

(By the way, I did not "run away" to another thread--some of us have other things to do than to educate you--desperate as your need might be.) In fact some of us have a life outside Mudcat--pity you don't seem to.


Added to which, if your attention span were more than 5 minutes--or you were capable of reading a thread before running off at the mouth (yet again), you would see that I made several postings before now-- on the so felicitously-named "amnestygate" thread.

At any rate, to return to the topic of this thread. I've managed to get you to admit several points:

1)   Walmart does have the financial resources to pay its people well enough so they could pay for their own medical care without going on Medicaid.

2) Therefore if Walmart did not want to do so, it could afford to make up the 8% required by the Maryland legislature.

3) There are in fact some Walmart employees on Medicaid in Maryland.



There are still questions you have not gotten around to answering. Simple questions:

1) Do you care about taxpayers? Please provide evidence.

2) Do you care about low-level Walmart employees? Again, please provide evidence.

That would be a good start.

And remember the ground rules-- especially the prohibition on no whining about "Walmart being singled out".

Thanks so much.