GUEST,thank God I'm not

You are entitled to any view you wish to hold, but in the interests of making a useful contribution to the thread, please refer to examples or noone will know how you have arrived at your position and I am sure I am not the only one who is curious to have it explained.


Daves wife.

You seem to fear that I was somehow compromising when I stated the following.

"There will be contact between them and that is a cold hard reality of life legally, no matter what I might try and do."

and I can see there might be some ambiguity in the next quote,

"Ultimataly supervised contact (or at the very least very reduced contact are the only answers to all problems stated above.)"

but would like to make clear that it is a reflection of the legal reality rather than of what I perceive to be the best option.

To reiterate, in this country there is no such thing as "no contact". It simply isn't a choice that I may legally make, and I do not intend to have myself arrested by interpol in Rio for kidnapping.

You said

"You are spinning your wheels in this thread and using circular reasoning to justify not taking any action"

If you read the thread again, you will see that I have taken lots of action and that I have done so succesfully against the odds.

The final hearing in all of this happens at the start of november, which is when I shall make my case for the best protected scenario that I and my daughter can hope for.

The in's and outs of the actual legal battle cannot be discussed here for obvious reasons.