Your point being?? HEre we are talking apples and oranges or other incongruities. One has nothing to do with the other at all. Even, as I said not as a lawyer, the difference in the issues is quite different.

While I cannot read the mind of the plaintiffs in this one==the one we are discussing here--I do feel it has more more to do with what I stated in the last note. The other suit---which, I add, I sided with the zoning issues involved about transients---is a horse of a different color. Probably a bad choice of words here---but that is what we are talking about. That and making some headlines.

Always remember---and it would save much litigation---WWGS.


Bill Hahn