"Not really, no."

Well then you are rejecting not just my testimony, but that of a few others as false.

On what grounds?

"This seems to be a rhetorical question with no right answer"

It wasn't rhetorical, but I agree that the answer isn't simple.

"and has no bearing, to my way of thinking, to the original question posed here"

Go back and read my first post and look for a consistent theme that exists there and in my last post and you will have your answer.

"I'm pretty damn baffled at what your agenda was for starting this thread"

I refer you to the first post again - the agenda is pretty clearly spelled out.

"I don't think you and the others here with what looks an awful lot like pseudo-radical behaviorist tinged popular beliefs about anger, wanted to hear or likely even discuss the answer I gave."

How have you arrived at that conclusion?

"C'est la guerre." translates as "that's war for you" (literally "It is the war")

You've resigned yourself to the reality of what war exactly?



Look - I'm justifying myself as opposed to my point. I'm defending my integrity in the face of assumptions about my intentions.



So you're not actually an expert on addiction.

What do you actually know about me?


Why do you keep coming back to this thread?