But it was his fault that he didn't stick to the subject.

Who was it in the second post to this thread did not stick to the subject and ensured that this thread could not simply be taken at face value?

Why is that poster (and other posters who did not stick to the subject and yourself) not also to subject to your rather selective judgement?

For I assume you also judge it was also my fault that a thread clearly titled 'Closed threads & deleted posts' is seen to be be to be intentionally littered by the current chief of the Mudcat Editing Team with the spam posts that other 'moderators'are busy trying to delete?

And also my fault that it is subjected to intentional attempts to discuss any subject, other that the one in its title including our 'moderators' being seen to encourage (from certain favoured posters) the foul and abusive personal attacks that our forum is assured our 'moderators' are there to protect us from?

Whatever you may think of me - are you prepared to be seen to be willing compromised into indulging in and supporting the bullying and double standards use to justify waht our 'moderators' are now seen to indulge themselves in and encourage other favoured posters to indulge in?

I think the answer is yes. For that is what you are demonstrating.