Well, just as an example of why it is a vain enterprize to debate with, say Mr. Finn. When you mischaracterize and misrepresent statements it is not an honest discussion. Who said I was pissed at the oil economy? It bothers me not one bit. I do fine with what I have. It might bother my fiance some but she's not sitting around wringing her hands. She has offers several times a year to sell her interest. Yawn. You assume facts not in evidence.

You refer to another thread about a statement in which I called someone a "janitor". That is a complete mischaracterization of what I wrote. I ASKED a QUESTION of someone's unstated employment. I said I didn't know whether they were a janitor or a senior analyst. Why didn't you say I called them a "senior analyst"? It's to no point and no avail to debate with someone who won't be honest. Which brings me back to my original question as to whether I should engage you in debate in the first place. I was right in my assessment. Futile and fruitless.