To the mal contents I say, Anyone can get deleted. It happens to the best of us, and to the worst. Get over it.

Not too sure who you would judge the mal contents - for from your posting - you never appear to be very content yourself and have felt free to constantly moan about what other's choose to post.

And as posters to our forum are not made aware in editing comments what the true nature and current level of imposed 'silent deletion' (and all the other forms of imposed editing action) is - how could any of us make any kind of informed judgement about who it may happens to (and who it may not)?

In order to address this - perhaps you would support the suggestion for all forms of editing action be recorded in editing comments and for editing comments to be limited to where some form of editing action has been judged to be required?   

I have no idea who you would judge to be the best or the worst and what critria you would judge this by. Perhaps you would care to explain?

Perhaps you would accept that the facts show that the worst 'offender' on our forum never gets anything deleted (unless their posts are deleted along with all the posts, when entire threads are deleted)?