The process Ron is called "Sorting the wheat from the chaff". Not only are you totally incapable of doing that, you actually accept whatever chaff others tend to add without, by your own admission, bothering to read, or listen to the original text.

Now then Ron the Cheney "Meet the Press" interview you refer to in your post. Just to let everybody know:

1) What was the subject of the interview, what was the topic under discussion?

2) Had that matter been investigated fully, or was it still under investigation?

3) What was the question that Cheney answered, "Well, I want to be very careful about how I say this. I'm not here today to make a specific allegation that Iraq was somehow responsible for 9-11. I can't say that."

4) What was the date again that Cheney made that clear denial? I take it that you accept that Cheney at that time was a senior member of the Bush Administration.

You have singularly failed to put forward any form of rational arguement to support your case - Guest Dickey on the other hand has done so comprehensively. Witter on Ron, continue with your personal attacks, all they do is illustrate the weakness of your arguement.