A comment on another thread put me in mind of this question---HILLARY.

Many nations have already had female leaders---India, UK, Israel, and more. So, is it so far fetched that we, who are supposedly so advanced, reject such an idea?   

Would Bill Clinton have influence if Hillary were Pres.? Would that be any different than the influence of wives on male Presidents?   Would his influence be negative or positive?

Just a few questions I am throwing out.   I am sure to give my opinion later---but remember that we live in historic times---A Bush Dynasty (unheard of since the days of the Adams family).

On another note---A Bush Dynasty speaks well for birth control.

Bill Hahn.