"So, UNTIL after the impeachment AND conviction of Bush for some reason, shouldn't HE be considered innocent?" bb

Wow. What happened to 'the buck stops here'? Are you truly arguing that Bush is not liable for the war he pursued in the face of what at the very least was contradictory evidence?

At this point, I only hope that he and his handlers have learned the value of diplomacy versus attack. He seems to have learned it in connection with North Korea- when he signed off on virtually the same political arrangement and agreement that Clinton had made with them.

It remains to be seen whether Iran will be handled the same way as NK. On the other hand, if he does to Iran what he did to Iraq his presidency is sunk. He still has time to retrieve some respect. I would think that the prospect of being listed as one of the top three worst US presidents would be galling.