The advantage of remotely seizing huge passenger jets loaded with fuel and explosives would be that no one would expect it. But now the lid is being torn off that particular plan. These two guys are serious, and educated in their fields, and if Boeing planes ARE intended for such a purpose, the plan will soon be scrapped. Because of these two.

They discussed WAY too much for me to take complete notes. Insulation, for example. Hawkins described an aluminum/iron oxide compound that ignites at 1600 degrees and then burns to 5000 degrees. He was talking about thermate, though he didn't use the term. Thermate was in evidence at the collapses of WTC 1 & 2. Also in the wreckage of Ron Brown's plane. These criminals apparently like to burn away any incriminating evidence at the sites of their crimes. Anyway, Hawkins described this stuff being used in a thin coating around a flexible rubber sheet for airline insulation. It bends into place and just sits there until a jet fuel fire ignites it, then it burns the plane at 5000 degrees. He said that would account for the 8-mile debris field of flight 93 in Pennsylvania, and the eyewitness reports of "raining plastic" along the debris field.

Hawkins has educated himself in all kinds of things relating to 9/11, but he's a forensic economist, and once he has his hands on court records regarding stock trades, etc., he should be able to prove a lot. He's already naming names of probable participants in the crime of 9/11 insider trading. People like Noam Chomsky. It'll be interesting to see if Chomsky sues. That's a pretty serious claim, and if Chomsky doesn't sue, then that's tantamount to an admission of guilt. And Chomsky won't sue, because that would lead to a trial and discovery and proof of SOMEONE'S involvement.

It's probably just a pipe dream that these two guys could make the 9/11 crime public knowledge, but you never know. There's always a flashpoint in any confrontation. The problem here is that they're dealing with the court system, which is already blocking hundreds of murder suits against Bush/Cheney for 9/11, so these 2 men probably won't fare any better. We should be thankful they're trying though.

Hopefully this will bring back Deutch's massive treason, Sandy Berger stuffing top secret files down his pants at the National Archives, etc.

And "gust of trim" was the term I couldn't recall a while back. It would have been physically impossible for a large Boeing jet to make the claimed approach to the pentagon, because the turbulence from it's wake interacting with the ground at that low altitude would have made the plane impossible to control. The pentagon "plane" is a red herring. It's a physical impossibility. A missile struck the building.