Fooles,

I have given reasons why IMO the blind dash to limit CO2 is flawed.

I have NO PROBLEM if you want to reduce CO2, but I have given several examples of how THAT is presented AS A CURE to global warming, which I dispute.

"By those like you apparently - "

HARDLY. I claim that those who feel that Global warming is caused by C)2 emmissions are ignoring the significant effects of the variable solar flus. Your example is of no validity- LOOK at the graphs that Wolfgang presented earlier- WHEN did the climate shift? NOT at the time YOU state, nor do you account for the previous several hundred million years of data.



"So the CONSERVATIVE decision is to just keep the accelerator pressed down hard to the floor, just in case there is no curve on the cliff road hidden in the fog ahead?...

Alleged 'Primary Cause' or not, human activity IS an input - welding the accelerator to the floor helps in what way?"


False claim- I have said the problem with CO2 emission reduction is the claim that it will stop Global Warming, and reduce our ability to DEAL with Global Warming, NOT that we should continue unlimited production of CO2. Feel free to stop all CO2 emmissions- BUT PLAN to deal with the real effects of global warming REGARDLESS.