"...if the NY Times does not report it, it cannot be true?"

"If this were a Republican, the cries here would befor immediate resignation from the Senate,..."

"....Watergate had only one source, initially. So I guess we should have ignored that, as well."

can you not EVER conduct a discussion of facts without erecting a straw man? I never SAID something should be ignored!!!! And I certainly would NOT demand the resignation of a Republican on that sort of reporting! I said it was strange that so little had been said, except by Byrne!

   In the final analysis, it is not whether she is rich, her husband is rich, or whether he made money while she was in office....it is whether she made decisions and used influence in order to help him make money. If she did, there should be reckoning , as with ANY manipulation of that sort.

Now...let's see if those who formally investigate these things find any grounds to look deeper.