Well, Amos is correct in his observations that the policies of Clinton, who BTW, I didn't like much more than Bush, weren't those of the pre-9/11 Bush administrations...

Richard Clark's testimoney before the 9/11 Commission painted a Bush administration that didn't take "terrorism" as serious as the former administration...

Revisting his testimoney (in it's entirity) will shed light on the specifics transitional actions he tried to get the new Bush team involved with that weren't acted upon...

Hisotians will get this one right though I fully understand why pure partisans will make every attempt to gloss over Clark's testimony because it doesn't jive with their never ending attempt to revise a story that is painfully clear to everyone else...

Bobert