Well, looks as if bb's last stay at the Betty Forf Clinic has worn off as he is back to trying to put words into other mouhts that others haven't said...

This is a rather bad habit, bb... Just stick with the arguments and leave others to do as well...

And for the record, I made no mention of the 1st amnmendmend, did I???

Yes _______

No_________

Yet you go on saying that I think the freedom of speech is something that the Founding fathers would have prohibited because I don't ***agree with you*** about the 2nd ammendment...

This behavior obn your part is not only irritating but dishonest... I have tried to point this out to you in the past but it seems you are not capable of turning away from debating practices that would have any high school debating coach jumpind down your throat over...

Please discontinue this dishonest and amatuerish dabating tactic... We've all seen it and it makes you look very unintellegent, shich you aren't...

If you can't debate an issue without making up what you wish your opponent had actually said then don't debate... It makes you7 look stupid... No dierespect intended... Just good advice...

Yo, Mick,

Hey, Big Guy... How's tricks in yer part of the world??? Okay... Maybe this discusssion is well beyond just constitutional overtones and given Guantanemo, hey, maybe the constitution isn't waht it used to be??? Yeah, we need to examine cause and effect... We need to use real science and real stats that aren't part of someones political axe to grind... Problem is that the NRA has everyone who is power scared to talk about these issues so what we get is a relentless diet of NRA's, which has a big dog in the race, propaganda... I'd like to see our democratically elected representatives feel as if they could actually use their 1st ammendement rights without the NRA targeting them for personal destruction....

Bobert