Bobert,

"Yet you go on saying that I think the freedom of speech is something that the Founding fathers would have prohibited because I don't ***agree with you*** about the 2nd ammendment..."

Care to tell me were *** I *** SAID THAT YOU SAID ANY SUCH THING?

*** I *** said
____________________________________________________________________
And how could they have envisioned the Internet? At the time of the Bill of Rights, it was SPEECH and PRESS- No mention at all of electronic expression. So, by your arguement, there is NO right to freedom of speech except by unamplified voice in the presence of those listening. And no right to freedom of the printed word unless it is produced by a hand-powered press.
_____________________________________________________________________


YOUR arguement that since the times have changed, the right in the Bill of Rights should as well, in order to make YOU feel safer. can be used against the OTHER rights therein. Sorry if you have a comprehesion problem.


Oh, that's right- YOU canbe as dishonest as you want- the rules can't possibly apply to you that you want others to follow.

"This behavior obn your part is not only irritating but dishonest... I have tried to point this out to you in the past but it seems you are not capable of turning away from debating practices that would have any high school debating coach jumpind down your throat over...

Please discontinue this dishonest and amatuerish dabating tactic... We've all seen it and it makes you look very unintellegent, shich you aren't...:

If you can't debate an issue without making up what you wish your opponent had actually said then don't debate... It makes you7 look stupid... No dierespect intended... Just good advice..."