Yeah, I was wondering which experts Ebbie was referring to. The link she posted leads to crap. The numbers don't add up. The piece was dismissed long ago. See, if the WTC towers could be brought down by simple airplanes, then new regulations must be needed, right? Notice the hurry-up date at the bottom of Ebbie's article. 2001. As I recall, this was published in Dec. of 2001. Halliburton needed SOMETHING on record before they could start grabbing those lucrative contracts (but building codes had to be "updated" first), and this article came to the rescue. It's all junk. The numbers are off, except for the numbers in the corporate bank accounts. Geez, Ebbie. Go to the PatriotsQuestion911 site and read some current science on this. The scary thing about that crap article you pointed to is that building codes HAVE been changed because of it.

Don Firth, as an expert in aeronautics, already discounted that airplane parts # thing some time ago. Surpried he didn't mention that when you posted the piece by "Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career."

The 9/11 thing is just getting interesting, Little Hawk. Bruce Willis is fixing to jump into the fray. People may not listen to Col. George Nelson and Dr. David Ray Griffin, but they're going to listen to Mr. Die Hard, dammit.