Oh, Dick. You were making such progress. I didn't call you a racist because of your moronic multiple-choice question. That's not racist, just... stupid. And choice number two in that "quiz" is what you think would happen if the Iraqi Shi'a "defeated" the Iraqi Sunni (whatever the fuck that would mean). It's totally in line with your statements in this and other threads. And it's still absolute bullshit. And yet you continue to blather on about "Iraq under Iranian rule." Even after it's been explained to you at length by several people why this will never happen... Do you really still not get it?

Now, you're a racist because you hate Muslims. Yanno, judging by your posting history. I mentioned it because, well, no-one else seemed to have noticed, or cared. Why are you a racist? As I've already mentioned, a large number of your posts are devoted to copy-pasting articles about Muslim "atrocities." Not Christian atrocites, not Hindu, not Rastafarian. Muslim. Only. You also devote a large number of your posts to documenting instances of Muslims supposedly "forcing" westerners to adapt to Islamic practices. Muslims. Only. And then there's that whole blood libel deal from last month. That's what sets you apart from the likes of beardedbruce. That revealed you to be absolute slime, dude. Even when corrected by Wolfgang, you defended your post as "sharing these images I run across that illustrate what happens in other countrys.(sic)" Oh, what "countrys" would those be? Lutheran? Catholic? No? Just Muslim? Huh, weird.

And then you defend your blood libel again last night, stating that the Ashura photo was how you illustrated that Iran is "an Islamic totalitarian state based on human rights issues alone." Although, if you weren't so lazy/stupid, you'd spend the big three minutes it would take to find out that bloodletting on Ashura is banned in Iran. Not that you give a fuck what the truth is.

---Lepus Rex