I posted a comment earlier that hasn't seemed to survive, but I'd like to respond to this.

"In fact who do you think both provides most support to environmental groups, and staffs them?"

          One of the most influential environmental groups in America is the Sierra Club. This organization is supported by people who have enough disposable income to make contributions. It is staffed, unfortunately, by a bunch of political opportunists who want nothing more than to bring public attention upon themselves.

          About one third of the Sierra Club's membership openly express concern about what runaway human migration is doing to the environment. The other two thirds are really more concerned about being seen as being politically correct than the environment itself.

          When the real environmentalists tried to make a move to change the direction of the club's policy, the political operatives went into high gear.

          Morris Dees got involved. And when it comes to making a political spectacle of oneself, Morris Dees puts Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to shame.

          The facts of the matter, however are these: Sometime in the late 1960's the Sierra Club did mention immigration as a threat to the environment in their literature. Once the political operatives took the club over, they changed their tune, and now refuse to comment on immigration or human migration. The people controlling the club's funds want to spend that money promoting their own personal agendas. Two thirds of the membership are so chicken-shit they're afraid somebody might think ill of them, so they let the club's management do what they want, and turn a blind eye to the degragation of the environment.