right...I see that position. I didn't claim that my simply stating a reasonable compromise would convince 'true believers' to agree with me...what I said was that the LAW should reflect it, so those who had no particular religious beliefs would not be subject to the whims of 'believers'.
Sorry Bill but you're still not getting it. I hate to see positions I agree with being undermined by flawed arguments. It's 2AM here. I'll try and express myself better in the morning.