All the following statements were explicitly directed at me. Excuse me for feeling that I was under attack. I still don't know why.
So you would advocate legalizing murder so that illegal murders would not occur?
AS I HAVE STATED, The point being ignored is that the pro-life folks are of the opinion that the fetus is a human being. UNLESS you discuss this, you leave the idea that murder is ok, as long as it is someone YOU think is not human- like Jews, Gypsies, handicapped, old folks, fetuses, etc.
You mean like in Germany, from 1939 to 1945? Oh, YOU mean the world as YOU want to have it be.
The fact that you advocate a line of reasoning similar to the ones thga the Nazis did is not over the top:
1. *** I *** am not infallible: WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE???
2. I am presenting a viewpoint I DO NOT claim to believe: BUT THE POINT THAT I AM TRYING TO MAKE is one that is NOT capable of being ignored IF one desires a resolution to the arguement.
Why are you here? It seems like you cannot consider any viewpoint, EVEN FROM THE ABSTRACT, IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE THINK A GIVEN WAY, other than those you have decided are correct: Is that why you claim such infallibility that you cannot engage in rational debate?