It wasn't working!

When you get short of an argument you throw in stuff about torture and human rights. That should not be used in place of rational argument. You are trying to browbeat me by talking about torture, Tibet, Darfur and probably the fall of Carthage.
I know that's going on but I'm trying to debate whether a boycott is a good idea.

You did try to imply that I was not concerned about human rights because I didn't support a boycott. However, I don't expect to get one.

Will you promise to use rational discussion instead of using pictures of abuse to browbeat people into accepting your logic?