Bush stated a conditional- IF Iran had a nuclear device THAT would be a scary thing. Will you state that it would not be scary??????


I wish you would try to understand conditionals.


I do get your point about "is"- BUT the report was done after the date you say Bush used present tense- so the conclusions had not been accepted even by the analysts when YOU claim that Bush should only have used past tense.

Why is this such a difficult piece of cronology to wrap yer head around, Bobert?


In addition, the report DOES NOT claim that the program is PRESENTLY not in progress- ONLY that there it had been stopped in 2003, and that there is not enough information to know IF, OR WHEN, it has restarted.

So, since I was unemployed in 2003, you are still saying that I must be unemployed now, as well.