"it seem that the only way to do that is to not allow you, bb, to revise history..."

IF I was revising history, why is it that I am using facts about what really happened, and you have not been able to demonstrate that those facts are incorrect?

You claim to have read the Blix report, yet ignore all that he said. Then you demand that ONLY the last paragraph be posted- as if that cherrypicking would make your false statements true.

You accuse Bush of what you yourself have been doing here, to push people to your own viewpoint; Yet you seem to think it is a crime for him to do so, and perfectly ok for you.

You made comments about Republicans not working even 5 days: I have been working every day but one in the last 5 weeks, and am scheduled to work this weekend as well. Yet your braod misstatements are to be considered absolute truth, and the real situation to be covered up for fear of pointing out your insistance of your opinions as actual fact.

When was it you demanded that Saddam comply with the UNR???

I have noted your extensive criticism of Bush for taking the action he thought needed: When have you criticised Saddam, or does he get a free pass because he left some Kuwaitis alive?